راهنمای بهترین روش کاربردی جستجوی متون پژوهشی- فارسی

در مباحث مربوط به علوم غذایی ابزارهای اندکی وجود دارد و بسیاری از آنها از تحقیقات پزشکی وام گرفته شده است. اما برخی از این ابزارها ممکن است در بهبود مهارتهای جستجو، ارزیابی کیفیت شواهد،  گزارش روش و نتایج تحقیق برای شما مفید واقع شوند. اگر مایل به کشف منابع دیگری هستید، لیست زیر به عنوان یک نمونه راهنما در نظر گرفته شده است. لطفا در صورت تمایل پیشنهادات خود را برای اضافه کردن به این لیست، به ما اطلاع دهید.

• Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance grey literature checklist – Flinders University.
• Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews
• CONSORT Statement is an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting randomized trials
• Critical appraisal of qualitative research – Teesside University.
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) – eight critical appraisal tools designed to be used when reading research.
• Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) – quality assessment tool for quantitative studies
• Equator Network – for health research.
• European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Tools – for critically appraising different study designs
• Good Publication Practice 3 guidelines – for medical research https://www.ismpp.org/gpp3
• GRADE – an approach to assess evidence.
• Grey literature in the health sciences – University of Pennsylvania Libraries.
• Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools — checklists for healthcare studies.
• Meridian – reporting standards that can help improve search quality in animal research are collated.
• National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools – Canadian resources for evidence-informed public health.
• PRISMA – focuses on the reporting of reviews evaluating randomized trials, but can also be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews of other types of research, particularly evaluations of interventions.
• REFLECT – a checklist for livestock trials including randomised, challenge and field trials looking at production, health, and food-safety outcomes.
• SIGN – critical appraisal notes and checklists.
• STROBE-Vet statement is a modification of the STROBE statement for use in reporting studies undertaken in animal populations.
• SYREAF – a rich resource about Systematic Reviews for Animals and Food with tutorials and guidance on each step of conducting a systematic review in this area.

هنگام تهیه این  راهنما دستورالعمل های زیر مورد مشاوره قرار گرفت.

• Health Knowledge: Finding and Appraising the Evidence
• National Collaborating Centre for Method and Tools
• University of Reading Library
• Teesside University
• The University of Queensland
• Campbell Collaboration
• Cochrane Collaboration
• Collaboration for Environmental Evidence
• The EPPI-Centre
• University of York

1. Wood H, O’Connor A, Sargeant J, Glanville J. Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: A narrative review. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(4):527-539. doi:.
2. Deeks J, Frampton G, Glanville J, et al. Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA J. 2010;8(6). https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1637.
3. Sargeant JM, Rajic A, Read S, Ohlsson A. The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health. Prev Vet Med. 2006;75(3-4):141-151. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.03.002.
4. Glanville J, Wood H, Arber M, Varley D, Frampton G, Brazier H. Technical Manual for Performing Electronic Literature Searches in Food and Feed Safety. www.efsa.europa.eu/publications. Accessed March 12, 2019.
5. O’Connor AM, Anderson KM, Goodell CK, Sargeant JM. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions I: Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014;61 Suppl 1:28-38. doi:10.1111/zph.12125.
6. Glanville J, Varley D, Brazier H, Arber M, Wood H, Dooley G. Inventory of Sources of Scientific Evidence Relevant to EFSA’s Risk Assessments and Information Sessions on Literature Searching Techniques (CFT/EFSA/SAS/2011/03 Inventory Report). EFSA Support Publ. 2014;11(6). doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2014.EN-593.
7. Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944-952. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012.
8. EFSA. Technical Report: Tools for Critically Appraising Different Study Designs, Systematic Review and Literature Searches.; 2015. doi:EFSA-Q-2014-00907.