Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Good review practice: a researcher guide to systematic review methodology in the sciences of food and health



Attrition bias: a bias introduced by missing data or study subjects which will lead to bias in analysis.

Bias: the deviation of outcomes from the truth.

Body of evidence: the totality of evidence that is used to substantiate certainty in the outcomes of independent studies.

Conflicts of interest: a set of circumstances by which a reviewer’s ability to influence the results are judged to conflict with their other interests, either professional or personal.

Critical appraisal: the process of systematically evaluating the outcomes of independent studies (evidence) using explicit and standard measures of validity.  

Detection bias: a bias introduced by an artefact that results in erroneous estimation of the outcomes.

Eligibility criteria: the acceptability measures by which the individual studies are judged for inclusion or exclusion from a systematic review.

Evidence hierarchies: a ranking approach that assigns different levels of validity or trustworthiness to different research methods or study designs based on the principles of rigor.

Evidence statements: short summaries of evidence from published literature that are gathered to help decision making in policy settings.

External validity: the degree to which the outcomes of an independent study reflect the truth beyond the subject study.

Grey literature: literature published by entities that are not commercial publishers.  Not peer-reviewed, it includes research reports, white papers, and policy documents produced by governmental agencies, industry, and research organizations; theses; conference proceedings; and preprints.  

Internal validity: the degree to which the outcomes stand true in an individual study. 

Meta analysis: a statistical technique that combines the results of individual studies to provide a more accurate estimation of their outcomes. 

Performance bias: a bias that results in systematic differences between investigated subject groups or participants due to poor compliance or poor conduct.   

Plain language: a writing that is clear and easy to read, understand and use entirely. 

Risk of bias: the likelihood of a systematic error or deviation from the truth in outcomes.

Secondary analyses: re-analysis of existing data collected from a review study for a purpose distinct from the original study.

Secondary outcomes: any important outcomes that are not pre-specified but tend to arise from the review in addition to primary outcomes.

Selection bias: a bias introduced when subjects or participants of a study are selected in a way that they are not truly representing the subjects or participants intended to be studied.

Selective outcomes bias: a bias that results in systematic differences between reported and unreported results by tendency to select and report findings based on the results.